[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2z2=0qNWZft6rokx0i=8E5ZbEg1WL5HMYg_DE1wPvZQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 16:02:42 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
c-sky_gcc_upstream@...ky.com, gnu-csky@...tor.com,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
wbx@...ibc-ng.org, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 09/26] csky: VDSO and rt_sigreturn
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:08 PM Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com> wrote:
> +
> + /*
> + * __NR_rt_sigreturn must be 173
> + * Because gcc/config/csky/linux-unwind.h use hard code to parse rt_sigframe.
> + */
> + err = setup_vdso_page(vdso->rt_signal_retcode);
> + if (err) panic("Cannot set signal return code, err: %x.", err);
__NR_rt_sigreturn is 139
I think you need to update the comment, and probably check your gcc sources
to ensure it still does the right thing.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists