[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180906143842.xlxcg5notwdaflww@queper01-lin>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:38:44 +0100
From: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
currojerez@...eup.net, Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/14] sched/topology: Make Energy Aware Scheduling
depend on schedutil
Hi Rafael,
On Thursday 06 Sep 2018 at 11:18:55 (+0200), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I'm not a particular fan of notifiers to be honest and you don't need
> to add an extra chain just in order to be able to register a callback
> from a single user.
Right. I agree there are alternatives to using notifiers. I used them
because they're existing infrastructure, and because they let me do what
I want without too much troubles, which are two important points.
> That can be achieved with a single callback
> pointer too, but also you could just call a function exported by the
> scheduler directly from where in the cpufreq code it needs to be
> called.
Are you thinking about something comparable to what is done in
cpufreq_add_update_util_hook() (kernel/sched/cpufreq.c) for example ?
That would probably have the same drawback as my current implementation,
that is that the scheduler is notified of _all_ governor changes, not
only changes to/from sugov although this is the only thing we care about
for EAS.
We could also hook things in sugov_start & sugov_stop directly, and keep
all changes into the scheduler ... That is slightly harder to implement
on the scheduler topology side, though.
Thoughts ?
> > Also, is there any hope that the 12 first patches could make it in 4.20
> > on their own ? Or is it already too late ?
>
> I'm walking through them right now, albeit somewhat slowly due to
> various distractions, so we'll see.
Thanks !
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists