[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180906152120.GA5055@dennisz-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:21:23 -0400
From: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, kernel-team@...com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] blkcg: fix ref count issue with bio_blkcg using
task_css
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:35:39AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:53:45PM -0400, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> > From: "Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" <dennisszhou@...il.com>
> > +/**
> > + * blkcg_get_css - find and get a reference to the css
> > + *
> > + * Find the css associated with either the kthread or the current task.
> > + */
> > +static inline struct cgroup_subsys_state *blkcg_get_css(void)
> > +{
> > + struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > +
> > + css = kthread_blkcg();
> > + if (css) {
> > + css_get(css);
> > + } else {
> > + while (true) {
> > + css = task_css(current, io_cgrp_id);
> > + if (likely(css_tryget(css)))
> > + break;
> > + cpu_relax();
>
> Does this work? I'm ignorant of what cpu_relax() does, but it seems if we're
> rcu_read_lock()'ed here we aren't going to queisce so if we fail to get the css
> here we just simply aren't going to get it unless we go to sleep right? An
> honest question, because this is all magic to me, I'd like to understand how
> this isn't going to infinite loop on us if css_tryget(css) fails.
>
Tejun replied earlier with an indepth answer. Thanks Tejun! I'll make
sure to add a comment detailing what's going on.
> > +/**
> > + * bio_blkcg - grab the blkcg associated with a bio
> > + * @bio: target bio
> > + *
> > + * This returns the blkcg associated with a bio, NULL if not associated.
> > + * Callers are expected to either handle NULL or know association has been
> > + * done prior to calling this.
> > + */
> > static inline struct blkcg *bio_blkcg(struct bio *bio)
> > {
> > - struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
> > -
> > if (bio && bio->bi_css)
> > return css_to_blkcg(bio->bi_css);
> > - css = kthread_blkcg();
> > - if (css)
> > - return css_to_blkcg(css);
> > - return css_to_blkcg(task_css(current, io_cgrp_id));
> > + return NULL;
> > }
> >
>
> So this is fine per se, but I know recently I was doing a bio_blkcg(NULL) to get
> whatever the blkcg was for the current task. I threw that work away so I'm not
> worried about me, but have you made sure nobody else is doing something similar?
>
Initially I thought the BFQ and CFQ stuff only interacted with bios
which should already be associated. Turns out during init, they rely on
that bio_blkcg to read from current and then do the wrong thing of hard
associating with it (_get vs _tryget).
I've created a __bio_blkcg which is identical to the old function with
notes to not use it. Making changes to BFQ and CFQ would take a good bit
more work to make sure I'm not breaking what they're expecting to do, so
I leave that to future work.
> > static inline bool blk_cgroup_congested(void)
> > @@ -519,6 +549,11 @@ static inline struct request_list *blk_get_rl(struct request_queue *q,
> > rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > blkcg = bio_blkcg(bio);
> > + if (blkcg) {
> > + css_get(&blkcg->css);
> > + } else {
> > + blkcg = css_to_blkcg(blkcg_get_css());
> > + }
>
> Kill these extra braces please. Thanks,
Done.
Thanks,
Dennis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists