[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180906153548.GA10088@amd>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:35:48 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>, sre@...nel.org
Cc: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: pwm: silently error out on EPROBE_DEFER
On Thu 2018-09-06 15:59:04, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> When probing, if we fail to get the pwm due to probe deferal, we shouldn't
> print an error message. Just be silent in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> index df80c89ebe7f..5d3faae51d59 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> @@ -100,8 +100,9 @@ static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
> led_data->pwm = devm_pwm_get(dev, led->name);
> if (IS_ERR(led_data->pwm)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(led_data->pwm);
> - dev_err(dev, "unable to request PWM for %s: %d\n",
> - led->name, ret);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to request PWM for %s: %d\n",
> + led->name, ret);
> return ret;
> }
Hmm, sometimes probing is deffered forever, and in such case debug
message is useful.
Do you see excessive number of these?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists