linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] efi_stub: update documentation on dtb= parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:51:11 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com>
Cc:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, olof@...om.net,
        scott.branden@...adcom.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, arnd@...db.de, leif.lindholm@...aro.org,
        agraf@...e.de, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi_stub: update documentation on dtb= parameter

On Wed,  5 Sep 2018 20:07:50 +0100
Grant Likely <grant.likely@....com> wrote:

> The dtb= parameter is no longer the primary mechanism for providing a
> devicetree to the kernel. Now either firmware or the boot selector (ex.
> Grub) should provide the devicetree and dtb= should only be used for
> debug or when using firmware that doesn't understand DT.
> Update the EFI stub documentation to reflect the current usage.

So I hate to be obnoxious, but...

> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
> the information in any medium. Thank you.

Can I get a version of the patch without this language?  Then I'll be glad
to apply it.

Thanks,

jon