[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180906161421.ba35p6qx5rvktjos@mac.bytemobile.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:14:21 +0200
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To: Valentin Vidic <Valentin.Vidic@...Net.hr>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>, <drbd-user@...ts.linbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkback: Switch to closed state after releasing the
backing device
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:27:56PM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 12:36:49PM +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:52:14AM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> > > Switching to closed state earlier can cause the block-drbd
> > > script to fail with 'Device is held open by someone':
> > >
> > > root: /etc/xen/scripts/block-drbd: remove XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/6/51712
> > > kernel: [ 2222.278235] block drbd6: State change failed: Device is held open by someone
> > > kernel: [ 2222.278304] block drbd6: state = { cs:Connected ro:Primary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate r----- }
> > > kernel: [ 2222.278340] block drbd6: wanted = { cs:Connected ro:Secondary/Secondary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate r----- }
> > > root: /etc/xen/scripts/block-drbd: Writing backend/vbd/6/51712/hotplug-error /etc/xen/scripts/block-drbd failed; error detected. backend/vbd/6/51712/hotplug-status error to xenstore.
> > > root: /etc/xen/scripts/block-drbd: /etc/xen/scripts/block-drbd failed; error detected.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Valentin Vidic <Valentin.Vidic@...Net.hr>
> > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > > drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> > > index a4bc74e72c39..43bddc996709 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
> > > @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ static void xen_blkif_free(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
> > > {
> > > WARN_ON(xen_blkif_disconnect(blkif));
> > > xen_vbd_free(&blkif->vbd);
> > > + xenbus_switch_state(blkif->be->dev, XenbusStateClosed);
> > > kfree(blkif->be->mode);
> > > kfree(blkif->be);
> > >
> > > @@ -814,7 +815,6 @@ static void frontend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
> > >
> > > case XenbusStateClosed:
> > > xen_blkif_disconnect(be->blkif);
> > > - xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed);
> > > if (xenbus_dev_is_online(dev))
> > > break;
> >
> > AFAICT, this will cause the backend to never switch to 'Closed' state
> > until the toolstack sets online to 0, which is not good IMO.
> >
> > If for example a frontend decides to close a device, the backend will
> > stay in state 'Closing' until the toolstack actually removes the disk
> > by setting online to 0.
> >
> > This will prevent resetting blk connections, as blkback will refuse to
> > switch to state XenbusStateInitWait unless it's at XenbusStateClosed
> > (see the XenbusStateInitialising case in frontend_changed), which will
> > never be reached with your patch.
>
> Ok, is it possible to test this somehow?
Yes, you can try booting a PV guest with pvgrub, that will cause
pvgrub to open a blk connection, then close it and afterwards the OS
kernel will start a new connection.
Thanks, Roger.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists