lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH+k93G4BZPrdEToJ2PaUjYsAbp9ftxEvYu3r7BE=Db50jDPwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 20:14:13 +0100
From:   Matt Hart <matthew.hart@...aro.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Widespread crashes in next-20180906

On 6 September 2018 at 16:23, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 03:13:23PM +0100, Matt Hart wrote:
>> On 6 September 2018 at 15:04, Theodore Y. Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 06:45:15AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> >> Build results:
>> >>       total: 134 pass: 133 fail: 1
>>
>> Do you build arm64? Because KernelCI is seeing build failures in arm64
>> defconfig for next-20180906
>> Clearly it's a module build problem for sunxi but I'm not sure who to
>> CC about this.
>>
> I do, but as part of the boot tests, not as explicit build test,
> to save a bit of time. Maybe I should run a build test as well.
>
>> https://kernelci.org/build/next/branch/master/kernel/next-20180906/
>> https://storage.kernelci.org/next/master/next-20180906/arm64/defconfig/build.log
>>
>> ERROR: "sun8i_tcon_top_de_config"
>> [drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i-tcon.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "sun8i_tcon_top_set_hdmi_src"
>> [drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i-tcon.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: "sun8i_tcon_top_of_table" [drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i-tcon.ko]
>> undefined!
>
> Same error here, in the boot tests. Sorry, there are just too many
> failures there, and I didn't go through all the logs.
>
> Do you have bisect results ? Otherwise I can run bisect later today;
> that should hopefully identify the culprit.

Bisecting it now, though it might finish after I'm done for the night.

>
> Thanks,
> Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ