[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180906193028.jvyp2dj3rto4ax7s@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:30:29 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...mens.com>,
tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 00/22] Linux 4.14.63-rt41-rc1
On 2018-09-06 12:43:49 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Your tree (v4.14.63) has
> > 80d20d35af1ed ("nohz: Fix local_timer_softirq_pending()")
> > 0a0e0829f9901 ("nohz: Fix missing tick reprogram when interrupting an
> > inline softirq")
> >
> > which means that the patch "nohz: Prevent erroneous tick stop
> > invocations" can be reverted / dropped. It might have clashed during the
> > emerge of the stable tree.
> >
>
> My tree also has this:
>
> commit 5536f5491a2e098
>
> softirq: keep the 'softirq pending' check RT-only
>
> The patch "nohz: Prevent erroneous tick stop invocations" was merged
> differently upstream. The original issue where a slow box could lock up
> with a pending timer remained. I currently assume that this is a RT only
> issue and keep the patch as RT only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>
>
> What needs to be done?
This commit can be removed / reverted. The two commits (80d20d35af1ed
and 0a0e0829f9901) fix the issue and this duct-tape commit
(5536f5491a2e098) is no longer required.
> -- Steve
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists