[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180906202943.GE9358@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:29:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, fenghua.yu@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com,
gavin.hindman@...el.com, jithu.joseph@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] x86/intel_rdt: Use perf infrastructure for
measurements
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:05:05PM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> When I separate the above into the two functions it just becomes either:
> rdpmcl(l2_hit_pmcnum, l2_hits_after);
> rdpmcl(l2_miss_pmcnum, l2_miss_after);
> or:
> rdpmcl(l3_hit_pmcnum, l3_hits_after);
> rdpmcl(l3_miss_pmcnum, l3_miss_after);
>
Right, which is the exact _same_ code, so you only need a single
function.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists