lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180906224213.7b162cbb@bbrezillon>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 22:42:13 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@...wiler.com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd: nand: reorder nand manufacturer ids

On Thu,  6 Sep 2018 10:49:21 +0200
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel@...wiler.com> wrote:

> From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
> 
> Reorder NAND manufacturer ids for clarity.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h     |  8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c
> index 5423c3bb388e..0851cd86bf19 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_ids.c
> @@ -169,21 +169,21 @@ struct nand_flash_dev nand_flash_ids[] = {
>  
>  /* Manufacturer IDs */
>  static const struct nand_manufacturer nand_manufacturers[] = {
> -	{NAND_MFR_TOSHIBA, "Toshiba", &toshiba_nand_manuf_ops},
> +	{NAND_MFR_AMD, "AMD/Spansion", &amd_nand_manuf_ops},
> +	{NAND_MFR_ATO, "ATO"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_EON, "Eon"},
>  	{NAND_MFR_ESMT, "ESMT"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_SAMSUNG, "Samsung", &samsung_nand_manuf_ops},
>  	{NAND_MFR_FUJITSU, "Fujitsu"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_NATIONAL, "National"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_RENESAS, "Renesas"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_STMICRO, "ST Micro"},
>  	{NAND_MFR_HYNIX, "Hynix", &hynix_nand_manuf_ops},
> -	{NAND_MFR_MICRON, "Micron", &micron_nand_manuf_ops},
> -	{NAND_MFR_AMD, "AMD/Spansion", &amd_nand_manuf_ops},
> +	{NAND_MFR_INTEL, "Intel"},
>  	{NAND_MFR_MACRONIX, "Macronix", &macronix_nand_manuf_ops},
> -	{NAND_MFR_EON, "Eon"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_MICRON, "Micron", &micron_nand_manuf_ops},
> +	{NAND_MFR_NATIONAL, "National"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_RENESAS, "Renesas"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_SAMSUNG, "Samsung", &samsung_nand_manuf_ops},
>  	{NAND_MFR_SANDISK, "SanDisk"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_INTEL, "Intel"},
> -	{NAND_MFR_ATO, "ATO"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_STMICRO, "ST Micro"},
> +	{NAND_MFR_TOSHIBA, "Toshiba", &toshiba_nand_manuf_ops},
>  	{NAND_MFR_WINBOND, "Winbond"},
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> index efb2345359bb..ca134851d211 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h
> @@ -1541,12 +1541,12 @@ nand_manufacturer_name(const struct nand_manufacturer *manufacturer)
>  
>  extern struct nand_flash_dev nand_flash_ids[];
>  
> -extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops toshiba_nand_manuf_ops;
> -extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops samsung_nand_manuf_ops;
> -extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops hynix_nand_manuf_ops;
> -extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops micron_nand_manuf_ops;
>  extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops amd_nand_manuf_ops;
> +extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops hynix_nand_manuf_ops;
>  extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops macronix_nand_manuf_ops;
> +extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops micron_nand_manuf_ops;
> +extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops samsung_nand_manuf_ops;
> +extern const struct nand_manufacturer_ops toshiba_nand_manuf_ops;

I'm okay with this kind of alphabetic reordering, but why not
reordering the macro definitions too?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ