linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98373: usleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANEJEGteyDV2pWjC=z_btexMOcYnRER8ScqVTYqxZQO6DOsNTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 12:28:28 -0700
From:   Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>
To:     broonie@...nel.org
Cc:     Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
        ryans.lee@...imintegrated.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98373: usleep_range() needs include/delay.h

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 10:56 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 10:52:24AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:11 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > Note that this isn't causing a warning upstream, presumably due to an
> > > implicit inclusion that isn't present in the v4.4 kernel that you appear
> > > to be using, or gets missed due to config differences.
>
> > Ok. Is this just an observation or are these reasons to not accept the
> > change?
>
> An observation, you should already have a mail about it being applied.

Ah ok! Thanks for pointing that out (and for reviewing/accepting the patch).

cheers,
grant