[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180907210912.461676986@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 23:09:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, stable@...nel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.18 106/145] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table() non-concurrent condition
4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
commit a6f572084fbee8b30f91465f4a085d7a90901c57 upstream.
Will noted that only checking mm_users is incorrect; we should also
check mm_count in order to cover CPUs that have a lazy reference to
this mm (and could do speculative TLB operations).
If removing this turns out to be a performance issue, we can
re-instate a more complete check, but in tlb_table_flush() eliding the
call_rcu_sched().
Fixes: 267239116987 ("mm, powerpc: move the RCU page-table freeing into generic code")
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/memory.c | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -391,15 +391,6 @@ void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather
{
struct mmu_table_batch **batch = &tlb->batch;
- /*
- * When there's less then two users of this mm there cannot be a
- * concurrent page-table walk.
- */
- if (atomic_read(&tlb->mm->mm_users) < 2) {
- __tlb_remove_table(table);
- return;
- }
-
if (*batch == NULL) {
*batch = (struct mmu_table_batch *)__get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (*batch == NULL) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists