[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180907130533.03ba3119@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 13:05:33 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the tip tree
Hi Kees,
Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
between commit:
bef459026b16 ("lkdtm: Test copy_to_user() on bad kernel pointer under KERNEL_DS")
from the tip tree and commit:
f90d1e0c7804 ("lkdtm: Add a test for STACKLEAK")
from the kspp tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
index 5a755590d3dc,aca26d81e9b8..000000000000
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/core.c
@@@ -183,7 -183,7 +183,8 @@@ static const struct crashtype crashtype
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM),
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND),
CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL),
+ CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL_DS),
+ CRASHTYPE(STACKLEAK_ERASING),
};
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists