[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180907073559.ejffdfjy7zpqetzq@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:35:59 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, yibin.gong@....com,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-imx@....com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] kernel/reboot.c: export pm_power_off_prepare
Hi Mark,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 09:48:16AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> > Can you ACK on those two regulator patches, so that I can queue this
> > series up on IMX tree?
>
> I was expecting to get a pull request with the precursor patches in it -
> the regulator driver seems to get a moderate amount of development so
> there's a reasonable risk of conflicts.
Are there any thing I can or should do?
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists