linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] media: docs-rst: Document m2m stateless video decoder interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 17:08:52 +0900
From:   Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To:     Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
Cc:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
        Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] media: docs-rst: Document m2m stateless video decoder interface

Hi Alex,

+Maxime Ripard +Ezequiel Garcia +Nicolas Dufresne

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:48 PM Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> This patch documents the protocol that user-space should follow when
> communicating with stateless video decoders. It is based on the
> following references:
>
> * The current protocol used by Chromium (converted from config store to
>   request API)
>
> * The submitted Cedrus VPU driver
>
> As such, some things may not be entirely consistent with the current
> state of drivers, so it would be great if all stakeholders could point
> out these inconsistencies. :)
>
> This patch is supposed to be applied on top of the Request API V18 as
> well as the memory-to-memory video decoder interface series by Tomasz
> Figa.
>
> It should be considered an early RFC.

Thanks a lot for working on this. I'll review this patch a bit later,
but let me post links to patches on which we had some earlier
discussions, to keep things together:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10462311/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10577969/

Also CCd folks who discussed there.

Best regards,
Tomasz