[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5B7YR03Jm1upOg2nsaKOb1iDD7-WGo-qx7S8m-nounCvA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 18:16:37 +0900
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <joro@...tes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, sboyd@...nel.org,
jcrouse@...eaurora.org, Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe,
add/remove device
Hi Vivek,
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:46 PM Vivek Gautam
<vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
>
> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> separately.
> Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
> runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
> that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
[snip]
> @@ -2215,10 +2281,17 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!bitmap_empty(smmu->context_map, ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS))
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "removing device with active domains!\n");
>
> + arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> /* Turn the thing off */
> writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
> + arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> +
> + if (pm_runtime_enabled(smmu->dev))
> + pm_runtime_force_suspend(smmu->dev);
> + else
> + clk_bulk_disable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
>
> - clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
> + clk_bulk_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
Aren't we missing pm_runtime_disable() here? We'll have the enable
count unbalanced if the driver is removed and probed again.
Also, if we add pm_runtime_disable(), we can reorder things a bit and
simplify into:
arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
/* Turn the thing off */
writel(sCR0_CLIENTPD, ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
if (pm_runtime_enabled())
pm_runtime_disable();
arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clks);
Best regards,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists