[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180907093557.GC12849@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:35:57 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/pti/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 entry trampoline
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 03:59:44PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> The SYSCALL64 trampoline has a couple of nice properties:
>
> - The usual sequence of SWAPGS followed by two GS-relative accesses to
> set up RSP is somewhat slow because the GS-relative accesses need
> to wait for SWAPGS to finish. The trampoline approach allows
> RIP-relative accesses to set up RSP, which avoids the stall.
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> index 31341ae7309f..7e79154846c8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
> @@ -434,11 +434,42 @@ static void __init pti_clone_p4d(unsigned long addr)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Clone the CPU_ENTRY_AREA into the user space visible page table.
> + * Clone the CPU_ENTRY_AREA and associated data into the user space visible
> + * page table.
> */
> static void __init pti_clone_user_shared(void)
> {
> + unsigned cpu;
Make that
unsigned int cpu;
Otherwise, patches removing complex code are always good!
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists