[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180907101139.20760-5-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:11:39 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] sched/numa: Do not move imbalanced load purely on the basis of an idle CPU
Commit 305c1fac3225 ("sched/numa: Evaluate move once per node")
restructured how task_numa_compare evaluates load but there is an anomaly.
task_numa_find_cpu() checks if the load balance between too nodes is too
imbalanced with the intent of only swapping tasks if it would improve
the balance overall. However, if an idle CPU is encountered, the task is
still moved if it's the best improvement but an idle cpu is always going
to appear to be the best improvement.
If a machine is lightly loaded such that all tasks can fit on one node then
the idle CPUs are found and the tasks migrate to one socket. From a NUMA
perspective, this seems intuitively great because memory accesses are all
local but there are two counter-intuitive effects.
First, the load balancer may move tasks so the machine is more evenly
utilised and conflict with automatic NUMA balancing which may respond by
scanning more frequently and increasing overhead. Second, sockets usually
have their own memory channels so using one socket means that fewer
channels are available yielding less memory bandwidth overall. For
memory-bound tasks, it can be beneficial to migrate to another socket and
migrate the data to increase bandwidth even though the accesses are remote
in the short term.
The second observation is not universally true for all workloads but some
of the computational kernels opf NAS benefit when paralellised with openMP.
NAS C class 2-socket
4.19.0-rc1 4.19.0-rc1
oneselect-v1r18 nomove-v1r19
Amean bt 62.26 ( 0.00%) 53.03 ( 14.83%)
Amean cg 27.85 ( 0.00%) 27.82 ( 0.09%)
Amean ep 8.94 ( 0.00%) 8.58 ( 4.09%)
Amean ft 11.89 ( 0.00%) 12.00 ( -0.93%)
Amean is 0.87 ( 0.00%) 0.86 ( 0.92%)
Amean lu 41.77 ( 0.00%) 38.95 ( 6.76%)
Amean mg 5.30 ( 0.00%) 5.26 ( 0.64%)
Amean sp 105.39 ( 0.00%) 63.80 ( 39.46%)
Amean ua 47.42 ( 0.00%) 43.99 ( 7.24%)
Active balancing for NUMA still happens but it greatly reduced. When
running with D class (so it runs longer), the relevant unpatched stats are
3773.21 Elapsed time in seconds
489.24 Mops/sec/thread
38,918 cpu-migrations
3,817,238 page-faults
11,197 sched:sched_move_numa
0 sched:sched_stick_numa
23 sched:sched_swap_numa
With the patch applied
2037.92 Elapsed time in seconds
905.83 Mops/sec/thread
147 cpu-migrations
552,529 page-faults
26 sched:sched_move_numa
0 sched:sched_stick_numa
16 sched:sched_swap_numa
Note the large drop in CPU migrations, the calls to sched_move_numa and
page faults.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d59d3e00a480..d4c289c11012 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ static bool task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
goto unlock;
if (!cur) {
- if (maymove || imp > env->best_imp)
+ if (maymove)
goto assign;
else
goto unlock;
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists