[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180907125740.GJ24142@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 14:57:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, jhugo@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: fix load_balance redo for null imbalance
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 02:55:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Beside this patch, I'm preparing another patch in fix small imbalance to
> > ensure 1 task per CPU in similar situation but according to the comment above,
> > we can reach this situation because of tasks priority
>
> Didn't we all hate fix_small_imbalance() ?
That is, all that load_per_task business is complete rubbish in this
cgroup world.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists