[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180907165203.GA1100574@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 09:52:03 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, kernel-team@...com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] blkcg: fix ref count issue with bio_blkcg using
task_css
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 05:10:34PM -0400, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> From: "Dennis Zhou (Facebook)" <dennisszhou@...il.com>
>
> The accessor function bio_blkcg either returns the blkcg associated with
> the bio or finds one in the current context. This can cause an issue
> when trying to associate a bio with a blkcg. Particularly, it's the
> third case that is problematic:
>
> return css_to_blkcg(task_css(current, io_cgrp_id));
>
> As the above may race against task migration and the cgroup exiting, it
> is not always ok to take a reference on the blkcg returned from
> bio_blkcg.
>
> This patch adds association ahead of calling bio_blkcg rather than
> after. This makes association a required and explicit step along the
> code paths for calling bio_blkcg. blk_get_rl is modified as well to get
> a reference to the blkcg it may use and blk_put_rl will always put the
> reference back. Association is also moved above the bio_blkcg call to
> ensure it will not return NULL in blk-iolatency.
>
> BFQ and CFQ utilize this flaw, but due to the complexity, I do not want
> to address this in this series. I've created a private version of the
> function with notes not to use it describing the flaw. Hopefully soon,
> that code can be cleaned up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennisszhou@...il.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists