linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix cg_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bed84882-b194-7e45-0db6-08b02bc672d5@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:06:36 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     jgkamat@...com
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jaygkamat@...il.com,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix cg_read_strcmp()

On 09/07/2018 10:49 AM, jgkamat@...com wrote:
> From: Jay Kamat <jgkamat@...com>
> 
> Fix a couple issues with cg_read_strcmp(), to improve correctness of
> cgroup tests
> - Fix cg_read_strcmp() always returning 0 for empty "needle" strings
> - Fix a memory leak in cg_read_strcmp()
> 
> Fixes: 84092dbcf901 ("selftests: cgroup: add memory controller self-tests")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jay Kamat <jgkamat@...com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> index 1e9e3c470561..8b644ea39725 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/cgroup_util.c
> @@ -89,17 +89,28 @@ int cg_read(const char *cgroup, const char *control, char *buf, size_t len)
>  int cg_read_strcmp(const char *cgroup, const char *control,
>  		   const char *expected)
>  {
> -	size_t size = strlen(expected) + 1;
> +	size_t size;
>  	char *buf;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Handle the case of comparing against empty string */
> +	if (!expected)
> +		size = 32;

This doesn't look right. I would think expected shouldn't be null?
It gets used below.

> +	else
> +		size = strlen(expected) + 1;
>  
>  	buf = malloc(size);
>  	if (!buf)
>  		return -1;
>  
> -	if (cg_read(cgroup, control, buf, size))
> +	if (cg_read(cgroup, control, buf, size)) {
> +		free(buf);
>  		return -1;
> +	}
>  
> -	return strcmp(expected, buf);
> +	ret = strcmp(expected, buf);

If expected is null, what's the point in running the test?
Is  empty "needle" string a valid test scenario?

> +	free(buf);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  int cg_read_strstr(const char *cgroup, const char *control, const char *needle)
> 

thanks,
-- Shuah