[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180907172720.48621-1-hangdianqj@163.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 10:27:20 -0700
From: jun qian <hangdianqj@....com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jun qian <hangdianqj@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: umem: replace spin_lock_bh with spin_lock in tasklet callback
As you are already in a tasklet, it is unnecessary to call spin_lock_bh.
Signed-off-by: jun qian <hangdianqj@....com>
---
drivers/block/umem.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/umem.c b/drivers/block/umem.c
index 5c7fb8cc4149..9094ca60949c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/umem.c
+++ b/drivers/block/umem.c
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static void process_page(unsigned long data)
struct cardinfo *card = (struct cardinfo *)data;
unsigned int dma_status = card->dma_status;
- spin_lock_bh(&card->lock);
+ spin_lock(&card->lock);
if (card->Active < 0)
goto out_unlock;
page = &card->mm_pages[card->Active];
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void process_page(unsigned long data)
mm_start_io(card);
}
out_unlock:
- spin_unlock_bh(&card->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&card->lock);
while (return_bio) {
struct bio *bio = return_bio;
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists