[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180907173154.GT3142@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 20:31:54 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...wei.com>,
Chien Tung <chien.tin.tung@...el.com>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband: nes: add unlikely() to assert()
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 06:25:03PM +0300, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> On 07/09/18 18:13, Doug Ledford wrote:
>
> > This patch was part of a larger series on lkml. In that context, I
> > acked it so that the series could be applied by whomever took it (it
> > didn't belong on rdma-list as a series since only one patch out of some
> > large number touched rdma files). Now it is being resent as not part of
> > a series, but my ack was preserved.
>
> Yes, apologies for the confusion (and maybe wrong process?).
> The patchset as a whole didn't seem to gain traction, so I decided to
> fallback to the more tedious process of submitting them individually.
>
> Since the specific patch was not altered, I assumed the ack was still
> valid - I am sorry if I did it wrongly
You didn't do anything wrong, I was curious because my gmail already
filtered some linux-rdma mails to wrong folder and I wasn't sure if
it is the case again.
Thanks
>
> --
> igor
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists