linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] irqchip: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1809081414150.1402@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:15:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: Convert to using %pOFn instead of
 device_node.name

On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Rob Herring wrote:

> In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
> convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

Should I take it or do you want to take it with others? If the latter,
acked-by-me.

Thanks,

	tglx