linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <226b8770-7041-39a4-5a06-6002a7c1225f@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 Sep 2018 21:53:00 +0200
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver

Dan,

On 09/07/2018 03:52 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
[...]
>>
>>> And I think Jacek pointed out that the bindings references in this bindings
>>> don't even exist.
>>>
>>> I am thinking we need to deprecate this MFD driver and consolidate these drivers
>>> in the LED directory as we indicated before.  I did not find any ti-lmu support
>>> code.
>>>
>>> ti-lmu common core code and then the LED children appending the feature differentiation.
>>
>>> Need some maintainer weigh in here.
>>
>> Hehe. I'm maintnainer. Fun.
> 
> I know.  I want to see if there was any other opinion.  Especially for the LED driver.
> 
[...]

I have a question - is this lm3697 LED controller a cell of some MFD
device? Or is it a self-contained chip?

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski