[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2873ce93abf93d31a160c7dcbf5b3ff42c5e3886.1536404280.git.sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 19:07:31 +0800
From: <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
To: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 15/22] pinctrl: mediatek: adjust error code and message when some register not supported is found
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
It's usual and not an error for there's some register not supported by a
certain SoC or a pin so that in the case we have to adjust the message to
print and the error code to get rid of unnecessary false alarm.
Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 35 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
index 18a3548..7cdd46f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
@@ -61,12 +61,21 @@ void mtk_rmw(struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl, u8 i, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 set)
static int mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
- const struct mtk_pin_reg_calc *rc,
- struct mtk_pin_field *pfd)
+ int field, struct mtk_pin_field *pfd)
{
const struct mtk_pin_field_calc *c, *e;
+ const struct mtk_pin_reg_calc *rc;
u32 bits;
+ if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) {
+ rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field];
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(hw->dev,
+ "Not support field %d for pin %d (%s)\n",
+ field, desc->number, desc->name);
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+ }
+
c = rc->range;
e = c + rc->nranges;
@@ -77,14 +86,15 @@ static int mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
}
if (c >= e) {
- dev_err(hw->dev, "Out of range for pin = %d (%s)\n",
- desc->number, desc->name);
- return -EINVAL;
+ dev_dbg(hw->dev, "Not support field %d for pin = %d (%s)\n",
+ field, desc->number, desc->name);
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
}
if (c->i_base > hw->nbase - 1) {
- dev_err(hw->dev, "Invalid base is found for pin = %d (%s)\n",
- desc->number, desc->name);
+ dev_err(hw->dev,
+ "Invalid base for field %d for pin = %d (%s)\n",
+ field, desc->number, desc->name);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -116,21 +126,12 @@ static int mtk_hw_pin_field_get(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
int field, struct mtk_pin_field *pfd)
{
- const struct mtk_pin_reg_calc *rc;
-
if (field < 0 || field >= PINCTRL_PIN_REG_MAX) {
dev_err(hw->dev, "Invalid Field %d\n", field);
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) {
- rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field];
- } else {
- dev_err(hw->dev, "Undefined range for field %d\n", field);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- return mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(hw, desc, rc, pfd);
+ return mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(hw, desc, field, pfd);
}
static void mtk_hw_bits_part(struct mtk_pin_field *pf, int *h, int *l)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists