[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHpGcMJ9jB+Ekfvf6HUvWUr8ipoSJkS+U5arShpMwyjuc4qftg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:53:09 +0200
From: Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To: tsi@...oix.net
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: sysfs: Do not return POSIX ACL xattrs via listxattr()
Marc,
Am Mo., 10. Sep. 2018 um 05:03 Uhr schrieb Marc Aurele La France
<tsi@...oix.net>:
> Greetings.
>
> Commit 786534b92f3ce68f4afc8a761c80b76887797b0a "tmpfs: listxattr
> should include POSIX ACL xattrs", which first appeared in 4.5 kernels,
> introduced a regression whereby listxattr() syscalls on anything in
> sysfs, or its mountpoint, return the name of the two POSIX ACL xattrs,
> but attempts to retrieve these values are denied with EOPNOTSUP. For
> example ...
>
> # getfattr -d --match=- /sys
> /sys: system.posix_acl_access: Operation not supported
> /sys: system.posix_acl_default: Operation not supported
> #
I can confirm this regression.
> This inconsistent behaviour confuses rsync(1) (among others) when it
> runs into a sysfs mountpoint, even when told to not descend into it.
> This issue occurs because simple_xattr_list() does not correctly deal
> with cached ACLs.
>
> The suggested fix below was developed with a 4.18.7 kernel, but should
> apply, modulo patch fuzz, to any kernel >= 4.7. A fix for 4.5 <=
> kernels < 4.7 is trivially different, but I won't bother given such
> kernels are no longer maintained.
>
> Note that the only other simple_xattr_list() caller, shmem, avoids
> this glitch by previously calling cache_no_acl() on all inodes it
> creates, so perhaps sysfs/kernfs should do the same.
>
> Please Reply-To-All.
>
> Thanks and have a great day.
>
> Marc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Aurèle La France <tsi@...oix.net>
>
> --- a/fs/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/xattr.c
> @@ -949,13 +949,13 @@ ssize_t simple_xattr_list(struct inode *inode, struct simple_xattrs *xattrs,
> int err = 0;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
> - if (inode->i_acl) {
> + if (inode->i_acl && !is_uncached_acl(inode->i_acl)) {
> err = xattr_list_one(&buffer, &remaining_size,
> XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_ACCESS);
> if (err)
> return err;
> }
> - if (inode->i_default_acl) {
> + if (inode->i_default_acl && !is_uncached_acl(inode->i_default_acl)) {
> err = xattr_list_one(&buffer, &remaining_size,
> XATTR_NAME_POSIX_ACL_DEFAULT);
> if (err)
This seems to be a better fix, but I haven't fully verified it, yet:
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -187,7 +187,8 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb,
struct inode *inode)
inode->i_mapping = mapping;
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&inode->i_dentry); /* buggered by rcu freeing */
#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
- inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl = ACL_NOT_CACHED;
+ inode->i_acl = inode->i_default_acl =
+ (sb->s_flags & SB_POSIXACL) ? ACL_NOT_CACHED : NULL;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
Thanks,
Andreas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists