[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21ec4e6f-aa39-66cf-af32-d9e8e85f4961@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:32:21 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/16] nvmem: add support for cell info
On 07/09/18 11:07, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Add new structs and routines allowing users to define nvmem cells from
> machine code. This global list of entries is parsed when a provider
> is registered and cells are associated with the relevant nvmem_device
> struct.
>
> A possible improvement for the future is to allow users to register
> cell tables after the nvmem provider has been registered by updating
> the cell list at each call to nvmem_(add|del)_cell_table().
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
I see some of this code is removed in first patch and added back here, I
dont really see a value in doing this in a single series of patchset.
I would recommend "[PATCH v2 01/16] nvmem: remove unused APIs" and this
patch to be merged.
> include/linux/nvmem-machine.h | 41 +++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/nvmem-machine.h
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9ad052aeac39..a520924bf0a9 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -10391,6 +10391,7 @@ F: drivers/nvmem/
> F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/
> F: Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
> F: include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
> +F: include/linux/nvmem-machine.h
> F: include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
>
> NXP SGTL5000 DRIVER
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 17307015905a..854baa0559a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
...
> *
> diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-machine.h b/include/linux/nvmem-machine.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1e199dfaacab
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-machine.h
This should go in nvmem-consumer.h, I don't think we should add header
files for each usecase. These are nvmem consumers so lets put them in
correct header file.
--srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists