linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <da9556fd-0022-8e6a-12b4-cc3babbae5b0@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:54:44 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users



On 07/09/18 11:07, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Next three patches improve the framework by adding a notifier chain
> for future use and fixing the issue with nvmem device names.
> 
> Finally we add support for cell definitions, cell lookups and make
> DT systems resolve the nvmem cells during provider's registration.
> 
> Last patches just use the SPDX license identifiers and make the
> naming convention for some arguments more consistent.
Please send separate series for fixes and things that do not depend on 
this new apis or Order/place them at the end of the series.

This can help reviewer when there is large number of patches in series 
with unrelated subject.

-s-rini