[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bed0d45d-d5c0-d2dc-03d7-eedf99246182@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:13:59 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>, kamil@...as.org,
a.hajda@...sung.com, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
jtp.park@...sung.com, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Tiffany Lin (林慧珊)
<tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Andrew-CT Chen (陳智迪)
<andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>, todor.tomov@...aro.org,
nicolas@...fresne.ca,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.org>,
ezequiel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Document memory-to-memory video codec interfaces
Hi Tomasz,
On 07/24/2018 04:06 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> This series attempts to add the documentation of what was discussed
> during Media Workshops at LinuxCon Europe 2012 in Barcelona and then
> later Embedded Linux Conference Europe 2014 in Düsseldorf and then
> eventually written down by Pawel Osciak and tweaked a bit by Chrome OS
> video team (but mostly in a cosmetic way or making the document more
> precise), during the several years of Chrome OS using the APIs in
> production.
>
> Note that most, if not all, of the API is already implemented in
> existing mainline drivers, such as s5p-mfc or mtk-vcodec. Intention of
> this series is just to formalize what we already have.
>
> It is an initial conversion from Google Docs to RST, so formatting is
> likely to need some further polishing. It is also the first time for me
> to create such long RST documention. I could not find any other instance
> of similar userspace sequence specifications among our Media documents,
> so I mostly followed what was there in the source. Feel free to suggest
> a better format.
>
> Much of credits should go to Pawel Osciak, for writing most of the
> original text of the initial RFC.
I'm adding this here as a result of an irc discussion, since it applies
to both encoders and decoders:
How to handle non-square pixel aspect ratios?
Decoders would have to report it through VIDIOC_CROPCAP, so this needs
to be documented when the application should call this, but I don't
think we can provide this information today for encoders.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists