[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180910094454.GJ14465@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:44:54 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] thunderbolt: Correlate PCI devices with Thunderbolt
ports
Hi Lukas,
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 11:42:01PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Ideas what we can do with correlation:
>
> * Represent the relationship between PCI devices and Thunderbolt ports
> with symlinks in sysfs.
I wonder is that really useful? I don't think we should be adding sysfs
entries without any real reason why it would be needed and who would be
using them.
> * Thunderbolt controllers up to revision 1 of Cactus Ridge 4C have to
> use INTx because MSI signaling is broken. This results in hotplug
> ports sharing interrupts with other devices and, when daisy-chaining
> multiple affected Thunderbolt controllers, can lead to extremely
> unbalanced interrupt usage. To avoid this we could prefer downstream
> ports for tunnel establishment which do not share interrupts (based
> on the nr_actions field of the correlated PCI device's irq_desc).
>
> * Alternatively, we could use non-working MSI signaling on affected
> controllers and synthesize an interrupt whenever a tunnel is
> established or goes down on unplug.
Problem I see with this patch as it stands is that you add 200+ lines of
code into the driver that is not being used by anything as far as I
understand it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists