[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f161f5fd-a651-eee1-78ee-63607021db7f@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:50:58 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/16] nvmem: add support for cell lookups from machine
code
On 10/09/18 10:45, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> Yes, this is how it should be!
>>
> Any actual reason for not putting these definitions into a separate
> 'machine' header? This approach is currently used by gpio, pinctrl,
> iio and regulator framework because most systems use either DT or ACPI
> and don't need to pull in any stuff aimed at board files.
I don't want to create header files specific to usecase!
Lets keep it simple!
--srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists