[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dec727cf-486f-8126-34f8-1b1099cec3a1@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:02:05 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Alban Bedel <albeu@...e.fr>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users
On 10/09/18 09:24, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> The API changes change so many things, that these series would be
> incompatible. I can send the series separately but they would be
> co-dependent anyway. Does it sound good?
What am asking is to reorder the patches in a such a way that its easy
to review.
ex: Order can be :
1> kref and update nvmem_unregister followed by the provider changes.
2> Add support to cell tables, cell lookup, notifier
3> general cleanup patches followed by fixes
Current set seems to jump from one thing to other which makes it hard to
follow and time consuming while review!
--srini
>
> Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists