[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-12b04875d666e83d27511df25580de84505bc758@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 03:06:42 -0700
From: tip-bot for Vincent Guittot <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: vincent.guittot@...aro.org, hpa@...or.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/pelt: Fix update_blocked_averages() for RT
and DL classes
Commit-ID: 12b04875d666e83d27511df25580de84505bc758
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/12b04875d666e83d27511df25580de84505bc758
Author: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:22:55 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:13:46 +0200
sched/pelt: Fix update_blocked_averages() for RT and DL classes
update_blocked_averages() is called to periodiccally decay the stalled load
of idle CPUs and to sync all loads before running load balance.
When cfs rq is idle, it trigs a load balance during pick_next_task_fair()
in order to potentially pull tasks and to use this newly idle CPU. This
load balance happens whereas prev task from another class has not been put
and its utilization updated yet. This may lead to wrongly account running
time as idle time for RT or DL classes.
Test that no RT or DL task is running when updating their utilization in
update_blocked_averages().
We still update RT and DL utilization instead of simply skipping them to
make sure that all metrics are synced when used during load balance.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: 371bf4273269 ("sched/rt: Add rt_rq utilization tracking")
Fixes: 3727e0e16340 ("sched/dl: Add dl_rq utilization tracking")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1535728975-22799-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b39fb596f6c1..8cff8d55ee95 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7263,6 +7263,7 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, *pos;
+ const struct sched_class *curr_class;
struct rq_flags rf;
bool done = true;
@@ -7299,8 +7300,10 @@ static void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
done = false;
}
- update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
- update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
+
+ curr_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
+ update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
+ update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
if (others_have_blocked(rq))
@@ -7365,13 +7368,16 @@ static inline void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
{
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
+ const struct sched_class *curr_class;
struct rq_flags rf;
rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
update_rq_clock(rq);
update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
- update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
- update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, 0);
+
+ curr_class = rq->curr->sched_class;
+ update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, curr_class == &rt_sched_class);
+ update_dl_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_task(rq), rq, curr_class == &dl_sched_class);
update_irq_load_avg(rq, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick = jiffies;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists