linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] irqchip: Add driver for Cirrus Logic Madera codecs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1eb18ed1-3c05-cec2-ec8c-0dfc512b366a@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:08:20 +0100
From:   Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kate Stewart" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] irqchip: Add driver for Cirrus Logic Madera
 codecs

On 10/09/18 12:33, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>>> On 30/08/18 11:31, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Interrupt support for Cirrus Logic Madera codecs
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2015-2018 Cirrus Logic
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>>>>> the
>>>>> + * Free Software Foundation; version 2.
>>>>
>>>> You have the SPDX identifier above, which makes this boilerplate
>>>> superfluous.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Our legal people want it left here.
>>> They are ok with the SPDX reference, but they want to keep an
>>> explicit statement of the license that was intended.
>>
>> The SPDX identifier is an explicit statement. Sigh...
> 
> Richard, could you please try to re-engage with your legal team and
> explain that the SPDX identifier replaces the licence statement.
> 

I'll ask.