[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bc8f69a-2d44-7ee2-133b-29f6dd4c0929@xilinx.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:35:04 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: Jolly Shah <jolly.shah@...inx.com>,
"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <rajanv@...inx.com>,
Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Jolly Shah <jollys@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 03/11] firmware: xilinx: Add zynqmp IOCTL API for
device control
On 9.9.2018 21:20, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Hi Olof,
>
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Jolly Shah <jolly.shah@...inx.com> wrote:
>>> From: Rajan Vaja <rajanv@...inx.com>
>>>
>>> Add ZynqMP firmware IOCTL API to control and configure
>>> devices like PLLs, SD, Gem, etc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rajan Vaja <rajanv@...inx.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jolly Shah <jollys@...inx.com>
>>
>> This patch worries me somewhat. It's a transparent pass-through ioctl
>> driver. Is there a spec available for what the implemented IOCTLs are?
>>
>> Should some of them be proper drivers instead of an opaque
>> pass-through like this? Could some of them have stability impact on
>> the platform such that there are security concerns and the list of
>> arguments should somehow be sanitized?
>
> I tend to agree with this, good catch.
>
>> What's the intended usecase anyway? Just a debug tool during
>> development, or something that you expect heavy use of by some
>> userspace middleware?
>
> I suspect it is another attempt to make userspace clocks/plls work? Scary.
none is trying to do that as far as I know.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists