| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AM5PR0402MB2865939D4412A4129AC0FC67F1050@AM5PR0402MB2865.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 03:31:56 +0000
From: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
To: Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com" <dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver
Hi Leo,
On 2018/9/7 4:51, Yang Li wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 4:51 AM Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > On September 05, 2018 at 11:22 Yang Li wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 11:22
> > > To: dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com
> > > Cc: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>; Rob Herring
> <robh+dt@...nel.org>;
> > > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND
> > > FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>;
> > > linuxppc- dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>; lkml
> > > <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX /
> > > MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE <linux-arm- kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soc: fsl: add RCPM driver
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:58 PM Wang, Dongsheng
> <dongsheng.wang@...-
> > > semitech.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please change your comments style.
> > >
> > > Although this doesn't get into the Linux kernel coding style
> > > documentation yet, Linus seems changed his mind to prefer // than /*
> > > */ comment style now.
> > > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fl
> > >
> kml .org%2Flkml%2F2017%2F11%2F25%2F133&data=02%7C01%7Cran.w
> ang_
> > >
> 1%40nxp.com%7Cc0d88e6690384e02b95108d612dec235%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c
> > >
> 6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636717145285126200&sdata=JIoCZp
> > >
> WhRyW76EqgSflfTDA1f0gMQGKa%2FcbvSc5CO%2Fw%3D&reserved=0
> > > So the
> > > // style should be acceptable for now.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2018/8/31 11:56, Ran Wang wrote:
> > > > > The NXP's QorIQ Processors based on ARM Core have RCPM module
> > > > > (Run Control and Power Management), which performs all
> > > > > device-level tasks associated with power management such as
> wakeup source control.
> > > > >
> > > > > This driver depends on FSL platform PM driver framework which
> > > > > help to isolate user and PM service provider (such as RCPM driver).
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Chenhui Zhao <chenhui.zhao@....com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ying Zhang <ying.zhang22455@....com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig | 6 ++
> > > > > drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c | 153
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode
> > > > > 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
> > > > > index 6517412..882330d 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
> > > > > @@ -30,3 +30,9 @@ config FSL_PLAT_PM
> > > > > have to know the implement details of wakeup function it
> require.
> > > > > Besides, it is also easy for service side to upgrade its logic when
> > > > > design changed and remain user side unchanged.
> > > > > +
> > > > > +config LS_RCPM
> > > > > + bool "Freescale RCPM support"
> > > > > + depends on (FSL_PLAT_PM)
> > > > > + help
> > > > > + This feature is to enable specified wakeup source for system
> sleep.
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile b/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
> > > > > index 8f9db23..43ff71a 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/Makefile
> > > > > @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QUICC_ENGINE) += qe/
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_CPM) += qe/
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_GUTS) += guts.o
> > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_PLAT_PM) += plat_pm.o
> > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_LS_RCPM) += ls-rcpm.o
> > >
> > > Probably use "_" instead of "-" for alignment.
> >
> > OK, will update in next version
> >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c
> > > > > b/drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c new file mode 100644 index
> > > > > 0000000..b0feb88
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/ls-rcpm.c
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
> > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 // // plat_pm.c - Freescale
> > > > > +Layerscape RCPM driver
> > >
> > > The file name here is not the same as the real file name.
> >
> > Got it, will correct it.
> >
> > > > > +//
> > > > > +// Copyright 2018 NXP
> > > > > +//
> > > > > +// Author: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>,
> > >
> > > Where do you need the comma in the end?
> >
> > My bad, will remove comma in next version.
> >
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include
> > > > > +<linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include
> > > > > +<soc/fsl/plat_pm.h>
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#define MAX_COMPATIBLE_NUM 10
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct rcpm_t {
> > > > > + struct device *dev;
> > > > > + void __iomem *ippdexpcr_addr;
> > > > > + bool big_endian; /* Big/Little endian of RCPM module */
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +// rcpm_handle - Configure RCPM reg according to wake up source
> > > > > +request // @user_dev: pointer to user's device struct // @flag:
> > > > > +to
> > > > > +enable(true) or disable(false) wakeup source // @handle_priv:
> > > > > +pointer to struct rcpm_t instance // // Return 0 on success
> > > > > +other negative errno
> > >
> > > Although Linus preferred this // comment style. I'm not sure if
> > > this will be handled correctly by the kernel-doc compiler.
> > >
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw
> > > w
> > > w.kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fv4.18%2Fdoc-guide%2Fkernel-
> > >
> doc.html&data=02%7C01%7Cran.wang_1%40nxp.com%7Cc0d88e669038
> > >
> 4e02b95108d612dec235%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0
> > > %7C636717145285126200&sdata=H7GkUNOLVG%2FCcZESzhtHBeHC
> bO9
> > > %2FK4k9EdH30Cxq2%2BM%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > So, do you think I need to change all comment style back to '/* ... */' ?
> > Actually I feel a little bit confused here.
>
> I think Linus's comment about // comment style applies to normal code
> comment. But kernel-doc comment is a special kind of code comment that
> needs to meet certain requirements. People can use the scripts/kernel-doc
> tool to generate readable API documents from the source code. It looks like
> you wanted to make the function description aligned with the kernel-doc
> format, but kernel-doc specifically requires to use the /* */ style(at least for
> now).
OK, will change style back to /* */.
Regards,
Ran
> Regards,
> Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists