lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2dc6fb51-dfd6-3509-8833-c889193dd4a9@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:56:09 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
To:     Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
        Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>, <linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add tree location for staging/erofs



On 2018/9/10 2:34, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Hi Chao, hi Gao,
> 
> On Sun, 2018-09-09T23:16+0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On 2018/9/8 11:28, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your new patch.
>>>
>>> It seems that this patch also introduces 2 new 'WARNING: line over 80 characters',
>>> could you please fix it in the patch?
> 
> @Chao,Gao: For some reason there seems to be a problem when receiving mails
> from you. The one I received now was the first one from you that reached me
> directly. Before I only got your messages in the quotes from Dan and now in the
> quotes from the mail I am responding to.
> (I will try to investigate the reason for this)
> 
> Sorry for my slow responses before.
> 
>> It will be better to fix that.
> 
> A new patch will shortly follow.
> 
>> Some reviewed cleanup patches are merged before this patch, then I failed to add
>> this one, so could you rebase on top of erofs dev branch in below link:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chao/linux.git/log/?h=erofs
> 
> I was not aware of this tree and worked off of staging / next.
> A patch is attached to this message that adds the tree to the MAINTAINERS file.

Hi Chao,

I think this tree has some PREVIEW patches which preview in linux-erofs mailing list only and
doesn't send to staging mailing list and LKML,

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chao/linux.git/log/?h=erofs

so erofs tree is actually Greg's staging tree.

> 
> -- >8 --
> 
> Currently this location is not documented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index a5b256b25905..9087e0b74821 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -13747,6 +13747,7 @@ F:	drivers/staging/comedi/
>  STAGING - EROFS FILE SYSTEM
>  M:	Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>
>  M:	Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> +T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chao/linux.git erofs

Hi Thomas,
nope, the erofs tree is actually the same as staging tree, so any patch should be based
on Greg's upstream tree.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

>  L:	linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org
>  S:	Maintained
>  F:	drivers/staging/erofs/
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ