[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180910151926.GA10889@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:19:26 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-imx@....com,
yibin.gong@....com, "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] kernel/reboot.c: export pm_power_off_prepare
On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:00:23AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I was expecting to get a pull request with the precursor patches in it -
> > the regulator driver seems to get a moderate amount of development so
> > there's a reasonable risk of conflicts.
> What about you create a stable topic branch for regulator patches and I
> pull it into IMX tree?
Sure, I can send a pull request back but the first two patches in the
series are ARM ones - are you OK with me just applying them and sending
them in the pull request or do you want to apply them first?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists