linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock data when SEV is active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1536596003.11460.82.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Sep 2018 09:13:23 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/kvm: Avoid dynamic allocation of pvclock
 data when SEV is active

On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 17:53 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:15:38AM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Now, the real question from all this SNAFU is, why can't all those point
> > > to a single struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info and all CPUs read a single
> > > thing? Why do they have to be per-CPU and thus waste so much memory?
> You forgot to answer to the real question - why do we need those things
> to be perCPU and why can't we use a single instance to share with *all*
> CPUs?

I can't speak to the actual TSC stuff, but...

The pvclock ABI includes a per-vCPU bit, PVCLOCK_GUEST_STOPPED, to indicate
that the VM has been paused by the host.  The guest uses this information to
update its watchdogs to avoid false positives.  I have no idea if there are
use cases for setting STOPPED on a subset of vCPUs, but the ABI allows it so
here we are...