[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180910165011.zcighyuabshsmxjb@armageddon.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:50:11 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
steve.capper@...aro.org, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
android-treble-mediatek-ext@...tner.android.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] arm: mm: reordering memory type table
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 07:22:10PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h
> index 92fd2c8a9af0..91b99fadcba1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-2level.h
> @@ -164,14 +164,23 @@
> #define L_PTE_MT_BUFFERABLE (_AT(pteval_t, 0x01) << 2) /* 0001 */
> #define L_PTE_MT_WRITETHROUGH (_AT(pteval_t, 0x02) << 2) /* 0010 */
> #define L_PTE_MT_WRITEBACK (_AT(pteval_t, 0x03) << 2) /* 0011 */
> +#define L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED (_AT(pteval_t, 0x04) << 2) /* 0100 */
> #define L_PTE_MT_MINICACHE (_AT(pteval_t, 0x06) << 2) /* 0110 (sa1100, xscale) */
> #define L_PTE_MT_WRITEALLOC (_AT(pteval_t, 0x07) << 2) /* 0111 */
> -#define L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED (_AT(pteval_t, 0x04) << 2) /* 0100 */
> -#define L_PTE_MT_DEV_NONSHARED (_AT(pteval_t, 0x0c) << 2) /* 1100 */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_V7) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_V7M) || \
> + defined (CONFIG_CPU_V6) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_V6K)
> +#define L_PTE_MT_DEV_WC L_PTE_MT_BUFFERABLE
> +#define L_PTE_MT_DEV_CACHED L_PTE_MT_WRITEBACK
> +#define L_PTE_MT_DEV_NONSHARED L_PTE_MT_MINICACHE
I think you can just ignore v7M here, it doesn't have an MMU.
You are defining L_PTE_MT_DEV_NONSHARED to L_PTE_MT_MINICACHE but what I
think you just meant is index 6 in the cpu_v6_mt_table which I would use
explicitly to avoid confusion.
Anyway, on ARMv7 or ARMv6+LPAE, the non-shared device gets mapped to
shared device in hardware. Looking through the arm32 code, it seems that
MT_DEVICE_NONSHARED is used by arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7779.c
and IIUC that's a v7 platform (R-Car H1, Cortex-A9). I think the above
should be defined to L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED, unless I miss any place where
DEV_NONSHARED is relevant on ARMv6 (adding Simon to confirm on
shmobile).
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S
> index 81d0efb055c6..f896a30653fa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-macros.S
> @@ -134,21 +134,21 @@
> .macro armv6_mt_table pfx
> \pfx\()_mt_table:
Since you changed the MT index, you'd have to fix proc-v7-*levels.S as
well. If you define DEV_NONSHARED to SHARED, I think you only need to
update the index for L_PTE_MT_VECTORS.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists