[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180910185039.GB7819@Red>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:50:39 +0200
From: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@...libre.com>
To: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc: Gilles.Muller@...6.fr, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr, agust@...x.de,
alexandre.torgue@...com, alistair@...ple.id.au,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, carlo@...one.org, davem@...emloft.net,
galak@...nel.crashing.org, joabreu@...opsys.com,
khilman@...libre.com, maxime.ripard@...tlin.com,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, mpe@...erman.id.au,
mporter@...nel.crashing.org, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
oss@...error.net, paulus@...ba.org, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
tj@...nel.org, vitb@...nel.crashing.org, wens@...e.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
cocci@...teme.lip6.fr, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: rename setbits32/clrbits32 to
setbits32_be/clrbits32_be
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:16:56AM +0200, Christophe LEROY wrote:
>
>
> Le 07/09/2018 à 21:41, Corentin Labbe a écrit :
> > Since setbits32/clrbits32 work on be32, it's better to remove ambiguity on
> > the used data type.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to call them setbits_be32() / clrbits_be32() to
> have something looking similar to in_be32() / ou_be32() ?
>
I agree, I will update the patch.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists