[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e85878a5-a5ae-59ea-0101-20361f49d32d@axentia.se>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 02:58:52 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Peter Chang <dpf@...gle.com>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepadinamani@...gle.com>,
John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested
locking
On 2018-09-11 01:27, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Why this:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> [..]
> #endif
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> [..]
> #endif
>
> ???
>
> This should use #else.
Yes. Water under the bridge...
Cheers,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists