linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] e1000e driver stuck at 10Mbps after reconnection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180911083147.GA31642@f2>
Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:31:47 +0900
From:   Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>
To:     Camille Bordignon <camille.bordignon@...ymile.com>
Cc:     "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@...el.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] e1000e driver stuck at 10Mbps after
 reconnection

On 2018/09/07 08:28, Camille Bordignon wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 août 2018 à 18:00:28 (+0300), Neftin, Sasha a écrit :
> > On 8/8/2018 17:24, Neftin, Sasha wrote:
> > > On 8/7/2018 09:42, Camille Bordignon wrote:
> > > > Le lundi 06 août 2018 à 15:45:29 (-0700), Alexander Duyck a écrit :
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:59 AM, Camille Bordignon
> > > > > <camille.bordignon@...ymile.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Recently we experienced some issues with intel NIC (I219-LM
> > > > > > and I219-V).
> > > > > > It seems that after a wire reconnection, auto-negotation "fails" and
> > > > > > link speed drips to 10 Mbps.
> > > > > > 
[...]
> 
> I recently figured out that neither the previous patch nor commit
> 0b76aae741abb9d16d2c0e67f8b1e766576f897d fix this issue.
> 
> In these cases, after reproducing the issue, when ethernet wire is connected
> kernel logs mention full speed (1000 Mbps) but actually it seems it is not.
> The problem persists.
> 

Hmm, so the newer (post 4110e02eb45e) kernels are actually "better", in
that they accurately report that link speed is 10Mb/s.

In the end, do you know of a kernel version that doesn't exhibit the
problem of slower actual link speed?

I had a look at the code and I tried to reproduce the problem on the
hardware that I have (I217) but could not.

Also, out of curiosity, have you tried playing with the speed, autoneg
and advertise settings via ethtool -s to force the link to 1000Mb/s?