linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2115864.0gBFVHkxzn@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:29:19 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@...el.com>
Cc:     Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        lenb@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, currojerez@...eup.net,
        ggherdovich@...e.cz, peterz@...radead.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Optimize IO boost in non HWP mode

On Monday, September 3, 2018 5:10:27 PM CEST Eero Tamminen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 31.08.2018 20:28, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> ...
> > As per testing Eero Tamminen, the results are comparable to the patchset
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10312259/
> > But he has to watch results for several days to check trend.
> 
> It's close, but there is some gap compared to Francisco's version.

It is unclear what exactly you are referring to without a link to the
patch.

Thanks,
Rafael