lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180911110409.GA16613@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:04:09 +0100
From:   Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, valentin.schneider@....com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/topology: SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY flag detection

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:21:11AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com> wrote:
> 
> > The SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY sched_domain flag is supposed to mark the
> > sched_domain in the hierarchy where all cpu capacities are visible for
> > any cpu's point of view on asymmetric cpu capacity systems. The
> 
> >  /*
> > + * Find the sched_domain_topology_level where all cpu capacities are visible
> > + * for all cpus.
> > + */
> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Examine topology from all cpu's point of views to detect the lowest
> > +	 * sched_domain_topology_level where a highest capacity cpu is visible
> > +	 * to everyone.
> > +	 */
> 
> >  #define SD_WAKE_AFFINE               0x0020  /* Wake task to waking CPU */
> > -#define SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY  0x0040  /* Groups have different max cpu capacities */
> > +#define SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY  0x0040  /* Domain members have different cpu capacities */
> 
> For future reference: *please* capitalize 'CPU' and 'CPUs' in future patches like the rest of 
> the scheduler does.
> 
> You can see it spelled right above the new definition: 'waking CPU' ;-)
> 
> (I fixed this up in this patch.)

Noted. Thanks for fixing up the patch.

Morten

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ