lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180911121548.GW5565@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 15:15:48 +0300
From:   Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/tsc: Consolidate init code"

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 06:53:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> 
> Good: 1718674.70 BogoMIPS (lpj=2863311530)
> Bad:   859455.59 BogoMIPS (lpj=1431852151)
> 
> while both kernels agree on the CPU frequency of 996MHz. This pretty much
> smells like the 32bit LPJ conversion bug which got fixed in rc3. Does the
> problem persist with rc3?

Indeed looks to be fixed by commit 17f6bac22493 ("x86/tsc:
Prevent result truncation on 32bit"). I both cherry-picked that
on top of rc2 to make sure it really is that commit, and also
tested plain rc3 to make sure it still works.

And comparing the bogomips between the three relevant commits makes
the bug pretty obvious in hindsight:
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 1718674.70 BogoMIPS (lpj=2863311530)
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 859455.59 BogoMIPS (lpj=1431852151)
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using timer frequency.. 1994.50 BogoMIPS (lpj=3322410)

I suppose we just got very lucky with older kernels.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ