[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWjKLqRPW=mUEk8LxWoSQSgw25p60PPL9WE=d12YfD-4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:11:34 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: hangdianqj@....com
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Iommu: ipmmu-vmsa: replace spin_lock_irqsave with
spin_lock in ISR
CC linux-renesas-soc
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:01 PM jun qian <hangdianqj@....com> wrote:
>
> As you are already in ISR, it is unnecessary to call spin_lock_irqsave.
>
> Signed-off-by: jun qian <hangdianqj@....com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> index 22b94f8a9a04..afa23d53502c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> @@ -569,9 +569,8 @@ static irqreturn_t ipmmu_irq(int irq, void *dev)
> struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu = dev;
> irqreturn_t status = IRQ_NONE;
> unsigned int i;
> - unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&mmu->lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&mmu->lock);
>
> /*
> * Check interrupts for all active contexts.
> @@ -583,7 +582,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ipmmu_irq(int irq, void *dev)
> status = IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmu->lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&mmu->lock);
>
> return status;
> }
> --
> 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists