[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d7beb50-f778-507a-4c3c-f6de92f8cfb9@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:02:05 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
sudeep.holla@....com, ganapatrao.kulkarni@...ium.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: add NUMA emulation support
Hi Michal,
On 09/10/2018 07:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 07-09-18 16:30:59, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 09/07/2018 02:34 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Thu 06-09-18 15:53:34, Shuah Khan wrote:
[....]
>>
>> In addition to isolation, being able to reserve a block instead is one of the
>> issues I am looking to address. Unfortunately memory cgroups won't address that
>> issue.
>
> Could you be more specific why you need reservations other than
> isolation.
>
Taking automotive as a specific example, there are two classes of applications:
1. critical applications that must run
2. Infotainment and misc. user-space.
In this case, being able to reserve a block of memory for critical applications
will ensure the memory is available for them. If a critical application has to
restart and/or when an on-demand critical application starts, it might not be able
to allocate memory if it is not reserved.
When a flat system has multiple memory blocks, with NUMA emulation in conjunction with
cpusets, one or more block can be reserved for critical applications configuring a set
of cpus and one of more memory nodes for them.
Memory cgroups will not support such reservation. Hope this helps explain the use-case
I am trying to address with this patch.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists