Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV+=EgAYogwNHbY=RExkGox_+YSeHV6pJtQb6g6PzD-CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:23:19 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/6] Driver for at91 usart in spi mode

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:36 PM Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On 11/09/2018 16:59:09+0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 11:40 AM Alexandre Belloni
> > <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > > On 11/09/2018 10:33:56+0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 04 Sep 2018, Radu Pirea wrote:
> > > > > Radu Pirea (6):
> > > > >   MAINTAINERS: add at91 usart mfd driver
> > > > >   dt-bindings: add binding for atmel-usart in SPI mode
> > > > >   mfd: at91-usart: added mfd driver for usart
> > > > >   MAINTAINERS: add at91 usart spi driver
> > > > >   spi: at91-usart: add driver for at91-usart as spi
> > > > >   tty/serial: atmel: change the driver to work under at91-usart mfd
> > > > >
> > > > >  .../bindings/{serial => mfd}/atmel-usart.txt  |  25 +-
> > > > >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  16 +
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig                           |   9 +
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/Makefile                          |   1 +
> > > > >  drivers/mfd/at91-usart.c                      |  71 +++
> > > > >  drivers/spi/Kconfig                           |   8 +
> > > > >  drivers/spi/Makefile                          |   1 +
> > > > >  drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c                  | 432 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig                    |   1 +
> > > > >  drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c             |  42 +-
> > > > >  include/dt-bindings/mfd/at91-usart.h          |  17 +
> > > > >  11 files changed, 606 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > > > >  rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{serial => mfd}/atmel-usart.txt (76%)
> > > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/at91-usart.c
> > > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c
> > > > >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/mfd/at91-usart.h
> > > >
> > > > Seeing as this patch-set has caused some issues this morning, I took
> > > > the liberty to peruse back into its history to figure out where things
> > > > started to go wrong.  I also re-reviewed the MFD driver - and I'm glad
> > > > I did!
> > > >
> > > > My Acked-by has been attached to the MFD portion since v5, which is
> > > > why the code hasn't caught my eye before today.  I reviewed the
> > > > relocation of the *binding document* (serial => mfd with no changes)
> > > > in v4 and nothing else.  It appears as though you mistakenly added it
> > > > to the *MFD driver* instead.  This explains my confusion in v10 when I
> > > > told you I'd already reviewed the binding document.
> > > >
> > > > As I said, I have re-reviewed the MFD driver and I'm afraid to say
> > > > that I do not like what I see.  Besides the missing header file and
> > > > the whitespace tabbing errors, I do not agree with the implementation.
> > > > Using MFD as a shim to hack around driver selection is not a valid
> > > > use-case.
> > > >
> > > > What's stopping you from just using the compatible string directly to
> > > > select which driver you need to probe?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Then you'd have multiple compatible strings for the same IP which is a
> > > big no-no.
> >
> > It's still the same hardware device, isn't?
> > What if the SPI or UART slave is not on-board, but on an expansion board?
> > Then the SoC-specific .dtsi has no idea what mode should be used.
> >
> > Hence shouldn't the software derive the hardware mode from the full
> > hardware description in DT? If that's impossible (I didn't look into detail
> > whether an SPI bus can easily be distinguished from a UART bus), perhaps
> > a mode property should be added?
>
> Yes, this is exactly what is done:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git/tree/drivers/mfd/at91-usart.c?h=ib-mfd-spi-tty-4.20-1#n33

OK.

I guess the main "hackish" part is that the mfd_cell uses of_compatible,
which thus requires having additional compatible values?

I think those can just be removed. AFAICS, the SPI and serial drivers already
match against the "at91_usart_spi" resp. "atmel_usart_serial" platform device
names?

> Only one compatbile for the IP and a property to know what is the mode.
> That property should indeed be set in the board dts and not the SoC
> dtsi.
>
> the other, less robust alternative was to look for child nodes and
> decide that if some where present it would indicate an SPI bus. But I
> think at some point we may have child nodes under a UART node.

Indeed, using the "new" serial bus.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists